Sunday, November 22, 2009

Relationship Theories - It could lead to dancing

Disclaimer:
This theory is not entirely about me or the other, for that alone would not make a "theory". It is more or less a collection of learnings.


A (quite long) Preamble
There is an old joke I read while in my first year in university.. back then when I read it, it was about Jews, and then later on I found out the same joke is told about baptists, muslims, etc. It doesn't make fun of the religions themselves as much as of our -sometimes narrow-minded- interpretations of the learnings. So to cut it short, the story goes that there was a couple who were preparing for their marriage, and they're meeting with the rabbi.. he goes on to explain how it's forbidden that men and women dance together in the ceremony, and then -going into more intimate details- they ask him about allowed sex positions, so they keep asking and he says yes it's allowed, and then the husband asks "how about doing it when standing?", to which the rabbi replies "OF COURSE NOT! THAT COULD LEAD TO DANCING!"
This joke has stuck with me ever since as an example of our contradictory double messages, and so whenever a situation calls for it, I find me saying to myself, "Oh but of course not, it could lead to dancing"

The Relationship Dilemma
So, the relationship dilemma here starts actually AFTER there is no relation. In that hazy crazy phase when you're not together but you're not exactly not together either, because one (or both) parties of the relationship still harbors feelings and doubts. So you are in a phase where you are still deciding how to define the boundaries of the relationship and what should/shouldnt happen under this new status, which is not an easy task at all...

And amongst all this, you find the weirdest requests and awkwardest moments between these two used-to-be lovers, wanna-be friends. Can we flirt casually, can we go out to dinners/coffees, can I call him, is it okay if he calls me late... etc etc.. Now I am not here to judge or be judged.. It is up to one entirely to define the boundaries they accept or demand for such a relation, and it is more or less a function of how you deal with friends of the opposite sex AND also how your relation with this ex was like...

So, again, no judging here.. However, the dating dilemma I am referring to starts when one of the two parties decides that they know what's better for the other (i.e. moving on), but at the same time they don't totally let go.. And you find yourself oscillating between wanting to let go yet feeling "trapped" in the relation (even if you're the one trapping yourself!).. and the one party who wants to stay knows that the one party more inclined to let go is ready to move on, just waiting for the right time or the right signal..

and then you find the weirdest behaviors coming up from you or the other, defining what should and should not be done under the context of the new connection. And it never makes any sense, so I would ask him to lunch but I would not go movies with him, because that would look like dating, and he would hug me, but he wouldn't call me when I am upset, because that would send me the wrong signal.. and so on..

So what is the solution to this? Should all breakups be done "cold turkey" as they say? or should we just "man up" to our decisions and do what our feelings/brains/impulses/morals (or whatever dictates your behavior) tells us to do?

So, I can flirt with you, I can talk to you, you can joke liberally with me, we can go out, and who knows maybe we'd even make out....

...But be careful not to do it standing, because -God forbid- it might lead to dancing!

7 comments:

Anonymous said...

I don't see exactly how it could lead to dancing. Seems very difficult. Can you help me visualize?

Nag said...

you're a protestant, you will never get it. Very easy to visualize actually..

"The answer to my riddle's still a secret."

Nag said...

do you always remember to enable the "email follow-up comments" thingie?

Ramez said...

Stockholm syndrome, Nag! Beware :) That's self defense against self defense, very complex - and risky - game!

Nag said...

Ramez-
but I dont see the syndrome manifested here, although I dont deny that -in other contexts- I do have it! :)

but here, how, where?

Anonymous said...

I never knew there was an email follow-up comments feature till now. Now my plan can be put in action. The world will tremble before my power. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.

Nag said...

Karim - Crezy berson.. whats ur plan candy man?

Ramez - Reading it again I think I see the syndrome manifestation, but what is self defense against self defense? care to elaborate?


good nite